With all that anguish concerning the magician's face I have decided to tackle the problem head-on (pardon the pun). Rather than waiting up until the end to finalise the face, let's do it straight away so as to get me out of my misery! At least that way if I stuff it up then I can stop work and excise the magician from the drawing altogether. On the other hand if I pull it off then I'll have enough motivation to finish this drawing - it is starting to get on my nerves; its uncompleted state taunting and mocking me every time I go into the "studio".

Magician's face

Much of my dilemma has focussed on what expression to the give our wily conjurer. The debate has raged in my head for weeks, so in the end I've gone for a compromise. A mesmerizing look with the merest hint of mystery and menace. That settled, let's commence.

The face, like that of the snake charmer, had to be just right, in terms of skin tone, angle of the head. Firstly, I back-filled everything around the head and hairline, then lightly marked-up the distinguishing facial features, and then commenced with eyes.

As is my practice I like to work on the eyes and the bridge of the nose first and then gradually radiate out from there. I started with the respective corneas and the eyeballs. From there, the eyebrows and then the creases and bags under the eyes. In this case I used B, 2B and 4B pencils to build up tone and then a torchon to blend into the facial strucure. I then used a soiled rag, to lightly apply skin tone to the forehead, again following the curvature of the face and underlying bone structure. To get the right effect, means that in certain areas (those which I wish to be darker) is rubbed with the rag but with more pressure than I used on the rest of the face. Near the top of his head, where the forehead meets the hairline I softened and lightened with an eraser to give the effect of light from a stage light landing on his noggin.

Having completed tha task, I started drawing his nose, cheeks and chin mostly with a rag, but also B and 2B pencils where I need sharper lines and more darkness to bring out facial features. This just left the moustache - in the end it is a mix of bush and ringmaster's moustache. To give the impression of hair/bristles/whiskers some highlights were added by a 2B pencil using short strokes to provide texture (or more accurately the perception of a lush moustache). That job finsished meant that only the hair was left to do. A similar technique to the moustache was used to get the required effect. To complete the head, and give it that "pop-out" look against the background, I went around the head and outlined it with a 9B pencil.

All up there was about 3 to 4 hours work in completing the face, and I think I've nailed it!!! The proportion and perspective works, the facial expression is close to what I want, and there is enough contrast with the background. Indian Rope Trick mock me no more.

mface.jpg


Magician's hands

We are really cruising now, just the hands and half a tuxedo suitcoat, and shirt to go. For the hands, I got Marie (my wife) to take a photo of my hands in a similar pose to the magician's, and worked off that. Unfortunately, I don't have any hand models to call on, so occasionally I have to take pics of my own body parts - better that than cutting them off I suppose! Not really a lot of great technique tips to offer here, given that we really looking at the lengths of the fingers between the knuckles. Really just shading as per the face. Still it took me a decent 1.5 hours of mucking around to complete.

mhands.jpg


The rest

Just the tuxedo coat and magician's shirt and bow tie left. As I've already discussed the techniques in Updates #2 and #4, I won't bore you with the relevant details. Suffice to say that another 1 hour was required to get everything completed at a level that meets my ridiculously demanding and pedantic standards. Why can't I draw in a more looser style?

But enough of that after 34 hours of intense drawing, not to mention x number of days of conceptualisation, the Indian Rope Trick has been vini vidi vici-ed....and yes I know self praise is no recommendation, but I reckon I've done a bloody good job on this. So drum roll please, ladies and gentlemen I present
the Indian Rope Trick (which for competition purposes might a(be)ka Weapons of Mass Destruction).

<<Older    Main    Newer>>

comments

Wonderfully executed and worth the wait, Detlef! You didn’t mention (unless I missed it) whose face you used as a photo reference. Is it you or a friend, or did you do it just from anatomy knowledge (not from a reference.) I am sure you will receive high praise for this very ambitious work.

Posted by Karen Winters on 27.03.05 at 01.27pm

Karen, I used a number of photo references for the magician (and a good magician doesn’t reveal all his tricks [or sources in this case]).  Suffice to say, it ain’t me - I’m much more unkempt, dishevelled etc!  The hands are mine though!

Posted by Detlef on 27.03.05 at 05.42pm

I never cease to be amazed by the complexity of your work, Detlef. Thanks for sharing the process with us.

Posted by Robyn on 27.03.05 at 07.06pm

I’m so glad I read the narrative before seeing the finished picture.  It’s one thing to see it and be amazed but the true appreciation comes with knowing the amount of work and thought that went into this.  Are you already planning the next one?

Posted by Janey on 29.03.05 at 02.51am

After seeing the your last greatest work, I went back and looked (again) at all your drawings.  As I started looking at each one I realized something.  Once I stopped thinking about the technique, I stopped noticing that they weren’t in color.  And they all remind me of 1940’s B&W movies.  Trouble and The Reader feel like Hitchcock.  CSI reminds of Dial M for Murder, Noir the Maltese Falcon or any John Marlow movie and Pier and Hat are a Steinbeck novels.  And if you hadn’t named Hobby Horse II, I would have expected Sabu to pop out (I’m an Archer film fanatic and alas, sadly most people reading this will probably not know who they were).  The detail is so good that you don’t see the detail which is why I forgot they weren’t in color. And that’s the link for me in all your work.  As you can tell, I’m a big fan and I can’t wait for the next drawing to start.

Posted by Janey on 29.03.05 at 03.16am

Oh, and one more thing.  What’s a “punter”?

Posted by Janey on 29.03.05 at 03.20am

Janey, a punter is someone who likes to bet or wager, especially on horse racing - one of my numerous vices.  In Australia the term has also gained popular usage to describe “an ordinary run-of-the-mill type guy”.

Posted by Detlef on 29.03.05 at 09.27am

post a comment

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?